Bridging Transitions: The Multifaceted Role of Systems Mediation - part 2 of 3
Entering the world of systems mediation's areas of work
Welcome to the second part of our three-part mini-series on systems mediation. In our first instalment, we laid the groundwork by exploring the theoretical frameworks that inspire and underpin the practice of systems mediation, providing a solid foundation for understanding its principles and potential impact.
As we continue our journey, this second post shifts focus towards the practical application of these principles. Here, we will introduce and delve into four of the seven "Areas of Work" (AOW) that we envision in the realm of systems mediation. These AOWs are more than theoretical concepts; they are practical avenues where the principles of systems mediation can be applied to address specific types of challenges and opportunities.
Each AOW represents a unique type of situation or context where systems mediation can play a transformative role. From addressing the end-of-life phase of systems in 'System Hospicing' to the 'System Composting' that leverages the remnants of old systems for new growth, these areas provide a more specific and actionable understanding of where and how systems mediation can be effectively implemented.
AOW 1 – System Hospicing & Embracing Endings
A crucial aspect of systems mediation is the process of system hospicing, a term that draws on the analogy of providing care and support at the end of life. In the context of socio-ecological systems, this involves managing the decline of outdated or unsustainable systems. Some historical examples are cod fishing system decline in Newfoundland and Labrador, fossil fuel energy systems before the Energiewende in Germany, the Apartheid regime before transition to Democracy in South Africa, Environmental Policies leading to the Ozone Layer Depletion in the 70’s and 80’s. It's a phase that requires sensitivity, understanding, and a deep appreciation of the cyclical nature of systems. In this section, we explore the nuances of system hospicing, focusing on two key elements: grief and letting go, and the reenchantment of decline.
Grief and Letting Go
The decline of a system, especially one that has been integral to societal functions, can be a source of significant grief. This grief arises from the loss of familiar structures, practices, and even identities that have been deeply entwined with the old system. Systems mediation, in this context, involves acknowledging and addressing this sense of loss.
It is crucial for systems mediators to create spaces where individuals and communities can express their grief. This process is not just about mourning but also about recognizing the old system’s value and contributions.
Systems mediators can help reframe the notion of decline from being an end to being a part of a continuous emergent evolutionary process.
Letting go is a critical step in moving towards new systems and possibilities. This involves challenging entrenched habits, beliefs, and structures that are no longer viable. As a system deteriorates, various elements within it perish. Some of these elements undergo regeneration while others reassemble and reincarnate in a different form. This is particularly true for aspects such as power, identities, and relationships, which adapt to serve the purpose of a new, emerging whole.
Mediators play a key role in helping stakeholders understand the necessity of this release and in supporting them through this transition, so that those that worked within and upheld declining systems can become contributors to, and not detractors of, emerging systems.
The Reenchantment of Decline
While decline and dissolution can be challenging, they also present opportunities for renewal and transformation. This phase can be reenchanting in the sense that it opens up possibilities for creating something new and more aligned with current values, needs and realities.
Systems mediators can help reframe the notion of decline from being an end to being a part of a continuous emergent evolutionary process. This perspective allows stakeholders to view the decline of the old system not as a failure but as a natural progression towards something different, which may be better aligned with the very necessity of sustaining life on Spaceship Earth.
As old systems decline, there's an imperative to cultivate hope and a vision for the future. Systems mediators can facilitate dialogues that open new doors of opportunity and possibility, stemming from the grief and release process, thereby envisioning new systems informed by the lessons learned from the old. This transformative process aids in redirecting energy from grief towards constructive and creative thinking.
Some Mediation Activities and Practices
Reflecting on the purpose and values of the system: Engaging in deep reflection to understand the purpose and values that drove the system or organization, and evaluating how well they align with the emerging needs and context.
Acknowledging, honouring and celebrating the past: Recognizing and celebrating the achievements, contributions, and learnings from the previous system or phase. This phase can involve rituals, storytelling, and acknowledging the efforts and experiences of those involved.
Creating a supportive environment: Fostering a safe and supportive space for individuals to express their emotions, concerns, and fears associated with the changes. This phase can involve facilitating dialogue, providing psychological and emotional support, encouraging open communication, normalizing grief, and offering productive skills to identify and cope with a range of fear, anger, etc.
Facilitating learning and knowledge transfer: Encouraging individuals to share their insights, lessons learned, and knowledge gained from the existing system. This phase helps capture valuable wisdom and experiences that can inform the emergence of new patterns and structures.
System hospicing, with its focus on managing endings with dignity and foresight, is a delicate yet essential part of systems mediation. It paves the way for the disintegration of the old, not with despair, but with a sense of purpose and anticipation for the new paths that lie ahead.
Some Guiding Questions to Explore
"What are the key strategies that should be employed to recognize and address the emotional and psychological impacts of system endings on stakeholders? How can heighten awareness in this area enhance the practice of system hospicing?"
"How can the process of system hospicing be structured to inclusively address and respect the diverse perspectives and needs of all stakeholders affected by the ending of a system?"
"How can the knowledge and lessons from closed or transformed systems be effectively captured and utilized for future systemic developments? What are the best practices in ensuring this knowledge transfer and utilization is thorough and impactful?"
How can we, using dignity and foresight, invite people and give permission for imagining new stories that may move people out of a role in the new system?
"What approaches are most effective in balancing the recognition of a declining system's value and contributions with the need to foster a mindset and actions geared towards transition and change? How can this balance be optimally achieved in system hospicing processes?"
AOW 2 – System Composting & Fertilizing the Future
The equally critical phase of system composting follows the process of system hospicing. In natural ecosystems, composting transforms organic waste into nutrient-rich soil, fostering new growth. Similarly, in socio-ecological systems, composting involves the reutilization and transformation of assets from declining systems to nourish and catalyze new systems.
System composting leverages this historical wisdom to inform and guide the development of new systems.
This phase is about viewing the remnants of the old not as refuse but as resources ripe for repurposing. Not only does it spark new development from established foundations but also paves the way for substantial changes that allow the experimentation of new operating systems in discontinuity with the present, opening up possibilities for unprecedented creations.
Asset Repurposing and Transformation
In the decline of any system, there are residual structures, technologies, skills, resources and people that retain intrinsic value. System composting involves identifying these assets and reimagining their use in new contexts. The High Line of New York City, an elevated railway that was repurposed into a public park, is a good example of system composting, where an obsolete infrastructure was transformed into a valuable new urban space, rather than being demolished.
The first step is a thorough assessment of the declining system to identify assets that can be repurposed. This might include physical infrastructure, technological tools, skilled human resources, or even intangible assets like knowledge and relationships.
Once identified, these assets can be creatively repurposed. For example, a factory space might be transformed into a community hub for sustainable practices, or the skills of a workforce might be redirected towards emerging green technologies.
This process also involves adapting these assets to fit the needs and dynamics of the new system. It requires innovative thinking and a willingness to experiment and iterate.
Catalyzing New Regenerative Growth from Old Foundations
System composting is not just about resource efficiency; it's about seeding the future with the wisdom of the past.
The old system, despite its decline, is a repository of experiences and knowledge. System composting leverages this historical wisdom to inform and guide the development of new systems.
By repurposing existing assets anchored in the potential of places and communities, we reduce waste and promote regeneration. This approach also contributes to building resilience in new systems, as it encourages adaptability and resourcefulness.
System composting can be a fertile ground for innovation. The challenge of transforming old assets into something valuable for new systems can spark creativity and lead to breakthrough solutions.
This phase often creates unique linkages between the old and new, bridging generations, ideologies, and practices. It fosters a sense of continuity and evolution, rather than abrupt change.
Some Mediation Activities and Practices
During the composting phase, there may be mediation activities and practices amongst various stakeholders that support the transformation, such as:
Decomposition and release: Allowing the old patterns, structures, or systems to naturally decompose and release their hold on the system. This may involve letting go of attachments, outdated beliefs, or ineffective practices.
Integration and synthesis: Taking the essential and valuable elements from the old system and integrating them into the emerging patterns and structures. This involves identifying the nutrients or insights gained from the decomposition process and incorporating them into the new framework.
Nourishing the soil: Fostering an environment that supports the growth and development of new possibilities. This can involve cultivating a culture of learning, collaboration, and innovation, providing the necessary resources, and nourishing the conditions for emergence.
Some Guiding Questions to Explore
"What are the essential considerations in identifying and repurposing valuable assets from declining systems for new uses? How can the process of system composting be optimized to maximize both sustainability and innovation?"
How does one know that a belief, practice or process can be composted and repurposed ? How do we transform versions of power ?
"In what ways can system composting contribute to fostering resilience and adaptability in emerging systems? What best practices should be adopted to ensure that the transformation of old assets leads to effective and sustainable growth in new systems?"
"In what ways can system composting be designed to ensure that it not only repurposes physical and intellectual assets but also integrates and values the diverse cultural and social contributions from various community segments?" How do we ‘compost’ roles/identities and relationships?
"How can the principles of system composting be integrated into broader strategies of socio-ecological transition? What role does this process play in ensuring that transitions are not only effective but also retain continuity and respect for the legacy of previous systems?"
AOW 3 – System Orchestration & Balancing Power Dynamics
After the phase of system composting comes the intricate process of system orchestration. This stage is pivotal in managing and balancing power dynamics within transitioning socio-ecological systems. System orchestration is not just about managing conflicting interests but also about harmonizing these interests to create a cohesive and regenerative whole. Here, systemic mediation navigates the complex power dynamics in new systems, focusing on the nuances of balancing these dynamics among diverse stakeholders and the art of maintaining equilibrium throughout system evolution.
The transformation of Medellín, Colombia, exemplifies system orchestration with a focus on balancing power dynamics through a multifaceted approach. It involved redistributing resources to empower marginalized communities, particularly through infrastructure projects like the MetroCable and the development of educational and cultural facilities. The inclusion of diverse stakeholders in decision-making processes ensured that the voices of underrepresented populations were heard, shifting traditional power balances. Focused efforts on fostering social equity, such as equal access to education and public services, addressed socio-economic disparities, while the promotion of active community participation in urban development redefined the relationship between the government and its citizens. Additionally, the creation of new economic opportunities and a reduction in crime weakened the influence of criminal organizations, leading to a more empowered and equitable society. This comprehensive revitalization not only transformed Medellín’s physical landscape but also its social and political structure, achieving a significant rebalancing of power within the city.
Navigating Stakeholder Interests in New Systems
In any new system, stakeholders come with varying degrees of power, influence, and interests. These dynamics can become particularly complex when the actors include both proponents of the old system and advocates for the new. While power dynamics are often perceived as a tug-of-war between the old and the new, it’s crucial to recognize that they also arise among actors within the new system itself.
The first step in system orchestration is to map out the existing power structures. This involves understanding who holds power, how it is exercised, and its impact on different stakeholders.
System mediators must facilitate open dialogues where all stakeholders can voice their concerns and aspirations. This inclusive approach helps in demystifying fears and misconceptions about the transition, especially among those who may feel threatened by the change.
Balancing power dynamics often requires negotiating interests to find common ground. Mediators play a crucial role in guiding these negotiations, ensuring that they are fair and that the outcomes are aligned with the broader goals of the transition.
The Art of Dynamic Equilibriums in System Evolution: Some Mediation Activities and Practices
Maintaining equilibrium amid change is a delicate art.
It involves a constant balancing act where the mediator ensures that no single interest or group dominates to the detriment of the system’s health and progression.
Managing Tensions: Tensions are inevitable in any transition, particularly when it involves shifting power dynamics. Effective system orchestration requires mediators to anticipate, recognize, and manage these tensions constructively.
Building Trust: Establishing and maintaining trust among stakeholders is fundamental. Trust can be built through consistent and transparent actions, empathetic communication, and demonstrating commitment to equitable outcomes.
Promoting Collaborative Leadership: Encouraging a leadership style that is collaborative rather than authoritarian can help in diffusing power struggles. This practice involves empowering multiple stakeholders to take on leadership roles, fostering a sense of shared responsibility and ownership.
Adaptive Strategies: As the system emerges, so too must the strategies for balancing power dynamics. This practice requires a continuous assessment of the changing landscape and the flexibility to adapt approaches accordingly.
Recognizing Positionality: The effectiveness of a systems mediator hinges on their understanding of their own positionality within the system. Recognizing one's biases, influences, and relationships is critical for maintaining objectivity and fairness. A mediator must be aware of how their position may impact their perception and approach to managing tensions and building trust. By actively reflecting on their positionality, mediators can ensure that they are facilitating processes and dialogues that are truly inclusive and representative of all interests within the system without “shaping” the sense-making process in their own image. This self-awareness is also essential in promoting collaborative leadership, as it helps mediators to empower others without overshadowing or inadvertently steering the process based on their own perspectives. It is through this conscious recognition of positionality that mediators can deploy adaptive strategies effectively, remaining sensitive to the nuances of power dynamics as the system evolves.
In conclusion, system orchestration in the context of socio-ecological transitions is a complex and dynamic process. It requires an in-depth understanding of power dynamics, not just as a contest between the old and new but also within the emerging systems. By effectively balancing these dynamics, systems mediators can facilitate a transition that is inclusive, equitable, and sustainable.
In the following sections, we will explore how these principles of system orchestration are applied in linking niche innovations to established regimes and in aligning individual, joint, and shared intentions for a unified system transition.
Some Guiding Questions to Explore
"What are the critical factors to consider when orchestrating diverse elements within a transitioning system to ensure a balance of power dynamics? How can the process be structured to promote equitable participation and representation?"
"How can system orchestration effectively balance power dynamics while actively promoting and incorporating the voices and interests of traditionally marginalized or underrepresented groups?"
"In the context of system orchestration, how can stakeholders effectively become aware, manage and navigate the complexities of conflicting interests and power struggles? What strategies are most effective in achieving harmony and forward momentum?"
What role does system orchestration play in facilitating a continuous, proactive and uninterrupted transition from old to new systems, particularly in terms of managing power shifts? How can mediators ensure that this transition maintains a focus on collective goals rather than individual power gains?
AOW 4 – Linking the Niche to the Regime: Geels Model Perspectives
An essential aspect of systems mediation is understanding and implementing the Geels Model of sociotechnical transitions, particularly in linking niche innovations to established regimes. This process is about bridging the gap between small-scale, often radical innovations (the niche) and the dominant societal systems and structures (the regime). It involves not just the introduction of new ideas or technologies but their integration into the broader socio-ecological landscape.
The adoption of open data in Montreal is a prime example of the multi-level perspective framework in action, transitioning from a niche advocacy movement to a key element of the city's governance strategy. Initially championed by tech enthusiasts, data activists, and community groups, the concept gained traction with the city government, leading to the development of an open data policy and an online data portal. This shift not only enhanced transparency and civic engagement, allowing citizens and local organizations to leverage public data for various innovative applications, but also influenced broader policy-making and urban governance practices. Montreal's journey with open data thus became a model for other cities, illustrating the transformative impact of integrating progressive, community-driven ideas into municipal governance structures.
Bridging Micro Innovations with Macro Structures
The challenge and opportunity in linking niche innovations to regimes lie in the ability to scale up and disseminate these innovations while ensuring they are compatible with, or can transform, existing systems.
Systems mediators play a critical role in identifying promising niche innovations that have the potential to address systemic challenges. This role involves not just recognizing technological advancements but also valuing social innovations and community-led initiatives.
Once identified, the next step is to create pathways for these innovations to influence and integrate into the broader regime. This step requires strategic planning, policy support, and often, the development of new business models or institutional arrangements.
Engaging a wide range of stakeholders, including policymakers, industry leaders, and community representatives, is crucial for ensuring that niche innovations are appropriately scaled and accepted. Systems mediators must facilitate these engagements, promoting dialogue, understanding, and collaboration.
The Dynamics of Transitioning Systems : Some Mediation Activities and Practices
The transition from niche to regime is rarely linear or smooth. It involves navigating a complex landscape of challenges, including resistance from established regimes, market dynamics, and regulatory hurdles.
Managing Resistance: Resistance from existing regimes is a common challenge. Systems mediators must work to understand the sources of resistance and devise strategies to address them, whether through demonstrating the benefits of the innovation, aligning with broader societal goals, or negotiating compromises.
Leveraging Windows of Opportunity: Often, transitions are facilitated by leveraging windows of opportunity – such as economic shifts, political changes, or social movements – that open up the regime to new possibilities. Systems mediators must be adept at identifying and capitalizing on these opportunities.
Iterative Learning and Adaptation: Transitioning systems require an iterative approach, where learning from both successes and failures is integral. Mediators should foster a culture of experimentation, learning, and adaptation, both within niche innovations and at the regime level.
By effectively linking the niche to the regime, systems mediation plays a pivotal role in the evolution of socio-ecological systems. It's a process that requires vision, strategic thinking, and the ability to work collaboratively across different scales and sectors.
Some Guiding Questions to Explore
"What are the key challenges and opportunities in bridging innovations from niche developments to established regimes? How can the insights from Geels’ model guide effective integration of these innovations into existing systems?"
"In applying Geels’ multilevel perspective, what strategies are crucial for ensuring that niche innovations are not only adopted by regimes but also sustainably scaled and integrated? What factors determine the success of such transitions?"
"How can practitioners utilize the multilevel perspective to anticipate and navigate potential resistance from established regimes when introducing niche innovations? What role does systems mediation play in facilitating this process?
"What strategies can be employed in the Geels model framework to ensure that niche innovations are not only technically integrated into existing regimes but also reflect and embrace the diverse needs and values of all community members?"
As we conclude this second instalment of our three-part series on systems mediation, we hope you have found the exploration of these Areas of Work both clear and enriching. Our intention is not to present final truths but rather to open avenues for reflection, to spark curiosity, and to deepen the understanding of the nuanced roles that systems mediation can play in our socio-ecological landscapes.
We are excited to bring you the third and final part of this series, where we will delve into the remaining three Areas of Work.
As we continue to explore and evolve these concepts, we invite you to join our growing community of learners and practitioners. Very soon, we will be introducing interactive mechanisms for exchange and engagement; by subscribing, you will receive timely notifications about our latest posts and information on how to participate in these exciting new exchanges.
Looking forward to part 3!