Bridging Transitions: The Multifaceted Role of Systems Mediation - part 3 of 3
Closing the loop of an initial framework for systems mediation.
As we embark on the third and final instalment of our series on systems mediation, we are excited to unveil the last three Areas of Work (AOW), pivotal in shaping the practice of systems mediation within socio-ecological transitions. This concluding part aims to round out our proposal of systems mediation's diverse applications and transformative potential.
Throughout this series, we've explored the foundational theories and the first practical applications of systems mediation. Now, as we approach the series' finale, we not only strive to complete your understanding of this field but also to invite you to engage further with these concepts in dynamic settings.
We're thrilled to announce a webinar hosted by the Tamarack Institute on February 28th, where we will provide an overview of our proposed framework. This webinar will be an excellent opportunity for us to connect, share insights, and explore systems mediation in an interactive format.
Beyond the webinar, we are also working on organizing a series of 'convenings' – gatherings that will be more oriented towards exchange and collaborative learning. These convenings will provide a platform for deeper engagement, allowing us to explore the nuances of systems mediation in a more participatory environment.
To stay informed about these exciting opportunities, including the webinar and upcoming convenings, we encourage you to join our mailing list. By subscribing, you will receive all the necessary information and updates about these events, ensuring that you are part of this evolving conversation.
Now, let’s dive into the final Areas of Work !
AOW 5 – Linking the Regime to the Landscape: A Broader Context
Besides exploring the connection between niche innovations and established regimes (see AOW 4), another pivotal aspect in systems mediation is linking these regimes to the broader landscape as per Geels’ Multilevel Perspective on Sociotechnical Transitions framework. This step involves tapping into macro-level dynamics to orient system change, thereby shaping and being shaped by the wider socio-ecological landscape. It's a process that goes beyond individual systems or innovations, addressing the broader context in which these systems operate.
Singapore's transformation into a "City in a Garden" is a prime real-life example of linking the landscape to the regime in urban planning, showcasing the adoption of green infrastructure as a response to global environmental and social sustainability trends. Pressure at the landscape level, primarily from international environmental advocacy groups, climate change agreements, and a global push towards sustainable urban living, spurred the Singaporean government act. This pressure resulted in the implementation of innovative green initiatives like the Gardens by the Bay and widespread integration of green roofs and walls across the city. These measures not only align with global sustainability goals but also significantly enhance the quality of life for residents, showcasing a successful melding of global environmental awareness with local urban development strategies, while promoting social equity through accessible green spaces.
« Linking the regime to the landscape is about seeing the bigger picture and understanding how localized changes can align with and influence broader societal trends. »
Influencing Wider Systemic Changes
The challenge in linking the regime to the landscape lies in influencing and enacting changes that resonate with broader, more encompassing patterns.
The landscape, in the Multi-level Perspective framework, refers to the wider context that includes cultural, political, and economic trends, societal norms, and overarching environmental issues. Understanding this landscape is crucial for systems mediators as it provides insight into external pressures and long-term trends that can drive or hinder systemic change.
Aligning systemic changes with these broader trends and pressures can amplify their impact. Systems mediators must strategize how regimes can adapt to or influence these wider dynamics. This process might involve aligning with global sustainability goals, leveraging cultural shifts, or navigating political changes.
Influencing the landscape often requires active advocacy and policy engagement. Systems mediators can play a role in shaping public discourse, influencing policy decisions, and advocating for systemic changes at higher levels of governance.
Understanding Macro-Level Dynamics: Some Mediation Activities and Practices
The transition of a regime to effectively engage with the landscape requires an understanding of the complex interplay of macro-level dynamics.
Listening to large scale patterns and trends to build Broader Coalitions: Creating broad-based coalitions and networks that span different sectors and levels of society can be instrumental. Such coalitions can unify disparate efforts, amplify messages, and create more substantial impacts on current system disruption and porosity to change.
Identifying Leverage Points: One key strategy is to identify and leverage points within the landscape where interventions can have a disproportionate impact. This strategy requires a deep understanding of the systemic interdependencies and the areas most receptive to change.
Facilitating Long-Term Visioning: Systems mediators can facilitate processes to develop harmonized long-term visions that resonate with a wide array of stakeholders. This long-term perspective helps in aligning immediate actions with broader goals and navigate the complexities of macro-level dynamics.
Linking the regime to the landscape is about seeing the bigger picture and understanding how localized changes can align with and influence broader societal trends. It requires systems mediators to operate at the intersection of the immediate and the expansive, the local and the global.
Some Guiding Questions to Explore
"What are the essential considerations for effectively linking established regimes to broader landscape-level changes? How can the dynamics between these levels be managed to ensure a cohesive and sustainable transition?"
"In the process of linking regime changes to the broader landscape, how can we ensure that this transition is inclusive, taking into account the varying impacts on different societal groups, especially the most vulnerable?"
"In the context of socio-ecological transitions, what strategies are crucial for aligning regime changes with wider societal and environmental trends? How can these strategies be implemented to maximize their impact on the landscape level?"
"How can practitioners in systems mediation leverage opportunities and overcome challenges presented by the broader landscape to facilitate effective regime transitions? What role does understanding the macro-level dynamics play in this process? What narratives do we need to shift and let go of within ourselves?”
“How can practitioners balance self-care of individuals and care for the groups acting within the system at all levels; understanding what we stand to gain and lose in the transitions; and on the most powerful roles we can take up?”
AOW 6 – Mediating the Transition from Individual to Joint Intentionality: A Critical Shift
In the realm of systems mediation, one of the most nuanced and critical transitions is the shift from individual to joint intentionality. This transition, central to the process of system change, involves moving beyond personal agendas to embrace a collective mindset. Here, the role of mediation is not just instrumental but transformative, guiding the journey from 'I' to 'We'. It's a process that requires skillful navigation of a collection of personal perspectives amongst system stakeholders, aligning them towards a unified, collaborative approach. This journey is underpinned by an understanding that collective action stems from more than just aligning individual goals; it requires a fundamental change in mindset, emotional engagement, and the way we perceive our interconnectedness.
« In this journey from 'I' to 'We', mediation is not just a facilitative tool but a transformative force. »
Embracing a Collaborative Mindset through Mediation
The mediator's role in fostering a collaborative mindset is multifaceted, involving breaking down conditioned, fragmented thinking and nurturing a sense of community and shared purpose.
Mediators guide individuals in moving beyond their individual perspectives, encouraging them to see the larger picture and how their actions impact the broader system. Challenging fragmented thinking and highlighting interdependencies is vital for transcending traditional thought patterns that often hinder collaborative efforts. Mediators help individuals see themselves as part of a collective whole, fostering a sense of shared responsibility.
By incorporating elements such as the Inner Development Goals (IDG) and other inner work, or Scaling Deep approaches, mediators help participants engage in self-reflection and personal growth. This kind of work is crucial for developing empathy, openness, and a readiness to collaborate. systems mediators create safe spaces for individuals to reconnect their emotions to their work. By acknowledging and valuing emotional expressions, mediation helps in forging deeper connections and commitment to the collective goals.
Mediators create and hold spaces where individuals feel safe and heard. Mediators bridge from the interpersonal (1-1) to the collective (1-many, and many-many) because they are trusted navigators of complex relationalities. In these spaces, stakeholders can openly share their views, concerns, and aspirations. Such dialogue is essential for building understanding and trust, key components of joint intentionality. Through targeted exercises and guided discussions, mediators cultivate empathy and compassion among stakeholders. This process encourages individuals to step into each other's shoes, appreciate diverse viewpoints, and recognize common goals.
In Goulburn Valley, Australia, a region grappling with severe water scarcity, a transformative shift from individual to joint intentionality was realized through facilitated community dialogues and workshops. Diverse stakeholders, including farmers, Indigenous groups, environmentalists, and government officials, engaged in deep listening and shared dialogue, breaking down preconceived notions and fostering a sense of interconnectedness. This process, embodying principles of inner work and collaborative methodologies, led to the development of community-driven sustainable water management strategies. These strategies not only influenced local policies but also strengthened communal bonds, showcasing a successful model of collaborative action and mindset shift essential for addressing complex socio-ecological challenges like climate change.
Navigating the 'I' to 'We' Transition
The transition from individual to joint intentionality is often laden with challenges – from ego clashes to resistance to change. It involves a series of structured interactions and facilitated processes that help in knitting together diverse individual intentions into a tapestry of joint purpose. Here, the mediator's expertise in navigating these challenges becomes crucial:
Personal and Collective Reflection: Mediators guide individuals through both personal reflection and collective introspection. This process encourages participants to examine and evolve their personal goals in light of group objectives, addressing any ego-centric barriers to collaboration.
Building Trust and Safety: Trust is the cornerstone of joint intentionality. Mediators invest time and effort in building trust among group members, essential for open dialogue and genuine collaboration.
Encouraging Collective Visioning: Through various collaborative exercises, mediators help groups in co-creating a collective vision. This shared vision acts as a north star, guiding the group's journey from individual goals to a unified purpose.
Fostering Collaborative Skills: Essential to this transition are skills such as active listening, conflict resolution, and consensus-building. Mediators often play the role of trainers, equipping participants with these necessary skills for effective collaboration.
Navigating Power Dynamics: Mediators skillfully navigate the power dynamics within groups, ensuring that all voices are heard and valued. This balance is crucial for maintaining group cohesion and preventing the dominance of any single individual or subgroup.
Some Guiding Questions to Explore
"What are the key challenges in facilitating the shift from individual to joint intentionality among stakeholders in systems mediation? How can mediators effectively encourage this critical transition in mindset and approach?"
"What approaches can be taken to ensure that the transition from individual to joint intentionality in systems mediation is inclusive, fostering a collective vision that genuinely reflects and respects the diversity of individual perspectives?"
"In the process of mediating towards joint intentionality, what strategies can be employed to ensure that individual perspectives are harmoniously integrated into a collective vision? How does this integration impact the effectiveness of systemic change?"
"What role do communication and conflict resolution play in the transition from individual to joint intentionality? How can mediators foster an environment where diverse individual intentions are respected and aligned towards common goals?
In this journey from 'I' to 'We', mediation is not just a facilitative tool but a transformative force. It involves guiding participants through a process of introspection, trauma healing, emotional reconnection, skill development, and collective visioning. It is a delicate and deliberate process. It involves guiding individuals to not only align with each other but to start building a foundation for the eventual emergence of shared intentionality. Systems mediators, through their expertise and facilitation, are instrumental in ensuring that this transition truly happens in an inclusive and productive manner.
AOW 7 – Mediating the Transition from Joint to Shared Intentionality: Cultivating a New Cultural Ethos
The journey from joint to shared intentionality marks a significant evolution in the process of system change. While joint intentionality focuses on aligning individual intentions for a common purpose, shared intentionality transcends this by creating a collective vision that embodies a unified purpose and direction. This stage, pivotal in systems mediation, harnesses the power of unity to drive transformative change in system transitions. Shared intentionality is also the birth of a new culture within the context of socio-ecological transition. Shared intentionality is a profound unification of individual and group aspirations into a collective vision, embodying its own signs, symbols, norms, and rituals. The emergence of such a new culture is essential for driving sustainable and transformative change, and for fostering trust in the new system as a complex adaptive organism that seeks balance, equity, inclusion, and longevity.
The Transition Towns movement, originating in Totnes, UK, epitomizes the evolution from joint to shared intentionality, transcending community collaboration and establishing a global ethos of sustainability. This movement grew from localized groups focused on environmental action into a widespread cultural shift, marked by a shared vision of resilience and ecological responsibility. It has introduced distinctive norms, symbols, and rituals into communities worldwide, such as local currencies symbolizing economic self-reliance, community-led energy projects as beacons of sustainable innovation, and local food systems that reconnect people with their environment. These elements collectively embody the movement’s ethos, far surpassing mere collaboration to create a deeply ingrained, global culture of sustainability. The Transition Towns movement thus demonstrates how shared intentionality, characterized by unified visions and cultural practices, can drive powerful socio-ecological change, reshaping not just local interactions but also forging a new global narrative on environmental stewardship and community resilience.
Fostering Shared Purpose, Collective Action and New Cultural Components
Shared intentionality goes beyond the alignment of goals; it's about creating a shared cultural identity that encapsulates the group's collective ethos and aspirations.
Sytems mediators guide stakeholders in co-creating a shared vision that reflects the collective aspirations and values of the group. This vision becomes a powerful motivator and a guidepost for future actions. Mediators also facilitate the development of unique signs and symbols that resonate with the group's shared vision. These could be narratives, visual symbols, or slogans that encapsulate their collective identity and purpose.
The process involves harmonizing diverse perspectives rather than merely relying on compromise, ensuring that the shared vision is inclusive and representative of all voices. Mediators skillfully navigate these diverse inputs, weaving them into a coherent whole. The process also involves establishing new norms and rituals that reinforce the shared culture. These practices help in solidifying the group's values and objectives, making them a part of their everyday experiences.
For shared intentionality to be effective, each member of the group must feel a sense of ownership over the collective vision. Mediators foster this sense of ownership through inclusive dialogue and ensuring that each participant sees their input reflected in the final vision.: A compelling narrative that tells the story of the group's journey and vision is vital. This narrative serves as a rallying cry, inspiring members and drawing in external stakeholders.
The Power of a Unified Cultural Ethos in System Transition
The culture born from shared intentionality becomes a driving force in the socio-ecological transition, providing strength and resilience to the collective efforts.
Strengthening Bonds and Resilience: This new culture fosters a strong sense of belonging and resilience. As members identify with this collective culture, they become more committed and better equipped to face challenges together.
Guiding Behavior and Decision-Making Towards Collective Action: The norms and values established through this shared culture guide the behavior and decision-making processes of the group. They serve as a compass, ensuring that actions are aligned with the collective vision.
Creating a Legacy of Transformation: This cultural shift has the potential to leave a legacy. It's not just about achieving immediate goals but about instilling a new way of thinking and being that can sustain the transition over time.
Embracing More-Than-Human Perspectives: In guiding the transition from individual to collective intentionality, mediators can also encourage the inclusion of more-than-human considerations. By recognizing the interconnectedness with the natural world and the cosmos, participants may find a portal to decenter themselves and prioritize the system. This broader perspective fosters a sense of unity not just among group members, but with the larger ecological and cosmic systems we are part of, leading to a more comprehensive and sustainable shared purpose."
Inspiring Broader Engagement and Cultural Shifts: A powerful shared vision and emerging culture can inspire and attract broader engagement from outside the initial group. It becomes a rallying point that can galvanize wider community support and action.
Some Guiding Questions to Explore
"What strategies and methodologies are most effective in guiding a group from joint to shared intentionality, particularly in the context of creating a new cultural ethos within an organization or community?"
"How can the process of mediating toward shared intentionality contribute to the development of a new set of norms, values, and behaviors that align with the desired systemic change? What challenges might arise in this cultural shift, and how can they be addressed?"
"In the transition from joint to shared intentionality, what role does the mediator play in ensuring that the emerging cultural ethos is inclusive, sustainable, and reflective of the collective vision and goals of the group?"
"As we facilitate the shift from joint to shared intentionality, how can we cultivate a new cultural ethos that is not only shared but also inclusive, celebrating diversity and promoting equitable participation across all levels of the system?"
The passage from joint to shared intentionality is a critical phase in systems mediation, marking the shift from collaborative alignment to the creation of a unified, purpose-driven collective. This shared intentionality is not just the sum of individual intentions; it's a new entity that embodies the collective’s aspirations, strengths, and hopes. It is this collective vision and unified action that powerfully drives system transitions, paving the way for sustainable and impactful change.
In essence, the journey from joint to shared intentionality in systems mediation is about cultivating a new cultural ethos that embodies the collective vision and values needed for socio-ecological transition. It is this shared culture, with its distinct symbols, norms, and rituals, that embeds the transition deeply in the fabric of the community, making it both sustainable and impactful.
Conclusion: The Convergence of Mediation Pathways
As we conclude our exploration of the multifaceted role of systems mediation in socio-ecological transitions, it becomes evident that the true power of this practice lies in its ability to integrate diverse areas of work so that we no longer avoid or ignore the difficult conversations about ceding space and voice and power. Systems mediators invite people, with honor and grace and love, to step into courageous conversations that birth the new and release what needs to die. Systemic mediation is not a linear process but a convergence of multiple pathways, each critical, yet interdependent and interconnected in the grand scheme of change.
Integrating Diverse Areas of Work
The journey of systems mediation weaves through various stages – from system hospicing and composting to orchestration, and from fostering joint intentionality to cultivating a shared cultural ethos. Each of these stages represents a unique area of work, necessitating specific skills, approaches, and mindsets. However, the effectiveness of systems mediation hinges on its ability to integrate these diverse areas into a cohesive whole.
Systems mediation must transcend traditional boundaries, merging emotional intelligence with strategic planning, personal transformation with collective visioning, and cultural evolution with practical implementation. This holistic approach ensures that every aspect of the transition is addressed, creating a more robust and resilient path forward. It must also be adaptive and responsive. By encompassing a range of strategies and methodologies, systems mediation remains adaptive and responsive to the evolving needs of the transition. This flexibility is crucial for navigating the complexities and uncertainties inherent in socio-ecological systems. It leads to a deeper understanding that the system requires stewardship—or shepherding—across the bridges from what was to what can be.
The Overlapping Nature of Systems Mediation Initiatives
The overlapping nature of systems mediation initiatives is both a challenge and an opportunity. It requires mediators to be adept at recognizing and managing the interdependencies and potential synergies between different areas of work.
The convergence of different mediation pathways allows for a rich cross-pollination of ideas and strategies. Insights gained in one area can inform and enhance approaches in another, leading to more innovative and effective solutions. While aiming for a unified goal of sustainable transition, systems mediation celebrates and harnesses diversity. This diversity in perspectives, skills, and approaches enriches the process, making it more inclusive and representative of the multifaceted nature of socio-ecological systems. As different initiatives overlap and intertwine, they contribute to a shared narrative of change. This narrative is crucial in building momentum, inspiring engagement, and sustaining effort towards the collective vision.
Integrating Various Ways of Knowing
While we explore the diverse frameworks that guide the practice of systems mediation in socio-ecological transitions, it's also crucial to acknowledge a significant aspect: most of these frameworks have their roots in Western epistemic communities. As systems mediation continues to evolve as a practice, there is an increasing need to hybridize these Western-centric approaches with other ways of knowing, especially those stemming from Indigenous worldviews, among others. These traditional and often overlooked knowledge systems offer profound insights into living in harmony with nature, community-focused decision-making, and sustainable resource management
As systems mediation emerges and matures, it's essential to integrate these diverse worldviews into its practice. This means actively involving Indigenous and local communities in the mediation process, respecting their unique relationship with their environment, and learning from time-tested practices and philosophies. Such integration not only enriches systems mediation with a broader range of perspectives but also ensures that the transitions we facilitate are more inclusive, equitable, and attuned to the diverse needs and wisdom of all communities.
Moving Towards a Practice of the Whole
By synthesizing Western frameworks with Indigenous and local knowledge, systems mediators can develop more nuanced, culturally responsive, and effective strategies for managing socio-ecological transitions. Such a convergent approach can lead to innovative solutions that are deeply rooted in the wisdom of diverse cultures and experiences, paving the way for a truly inclusive and holistic form of systems mediation.
Systems mediation stands as a beacon of integrated, holistic, and adaptive practice in the realm of socio-ecological transitions. Its strength lies in its ability to bring together diverse areas of work, manage their areas of overlap, and harness their collective power for a transformative journey. As we continue to navigate the complexities of our changing world, the principles and practices of systems mediation offer a pathway not just for managing transitions but for thriving through them.
The journey ahead requires openness, humility, and a willingness to learn from and incorporate a myriad of voices and perspectives, especially those that have been historically marginalized and whose system wisdom/knowledge has been erased.
As we share the framework we've developed, many of you have mentioned that, in one way or another, you act or have acted as system mediators. First-hand experience is incredibly valuable to us. Therefore, for those who feel they have played a role as a system mediator, we warmly invite you to participate in our Systems Mediation Survey. This is your opportunity to share your personal experiences, insights, and reflections on systems mediation. Your contributions will not only enrich our collective knowledge but also play a vital role in shaping the future discourse in this field.
Interested to be part of the conversation ? Join us to receive further updates and event information.